RSS

Monthly Archives: December 2011

15 years of “Razzle Dazzle”…

I neglected to mention on Nov. 14 that the “Chicago” revival had marked its 15th year on Broadway. Put in perspective: It’s the longest-running revival on Broadway and the fourth longest-running Broadway musical with 6240 performances, edging out its former rival “A Chorus Line.” It seems to show no signs of slowing down, which is cause for concern for current number three “Les Misérables.”

During my freelance writing days in New York in the mid-90s, I made extra money (sometimes not even extra — just money) working front of house selling souvenirs (programs, t-shirts, and mugs) at the Shubert Theater, then home of “Chicago.” It’s not hard work — you’re on duty for half an hour prior to the show, during intermission, and then 15 minutes after the show ends. Otherwise, you can spend your downtime hanging out with the bartenders in the lounge (only some of whom weren’t actors but all had great stories to tell), preparing for an audition (like the aforementioned actors), or browsing through the Virgin Megastore in Times Square (now since gone, alas). If you were a particularly obsessed theater fan as I was, you’d watch the show — not just once, as everyone did on their first night, but pretty much every night. It was like the gay version of “The Rocky Horror Picture Show”… wait, no that doesn’t make sense. It was like “The Rocky Horror Picture Show” but you didn’t shout or throw things at the stage.

It’s impossible to overestimate the impact of the show for me back then. There were days where the major impetus to get up in the morning was the knowledge that I was going to hear the opening strains of the overture that night. It was theatrical Prozac.

I started working at the Shubert just after Marilu Henner (“Taxi”) had replaced Anne Reinking, the show’s choreographer, as Roxie Hart. There was a lot of talk about how clearly superior Reinking had been in the role, which might have been the case (I never had the chance to see her — even when she later returned for a brief engagement, I was out of town), but I thought Henner did an admirable job. It’s not a true comparison, but when I listen to the revival’s cast recording, I think that Henner had a bit more emotion and range during her big number, “Roxie,” than Reinking. Henner was also head and shoulders above some of the later unfortunate bits of stunt Roxie casting, including Ashlee Simpson-Wentz and… actually, it’s hard to get much worse than that.

Bebe Neuwirth at the 15th anniversary performance of "Chicago"

Bebe Neuwirth was phenomenal and with all respect to the wonderful Chita Rivera, who created the part, it’s Neuwirth who I will forever associate with Velma Kelly. Her name recognition as Lilith Sternin-Crane from “Cheers” and “Frasier” probably helped bring people through the door, but they were blown out of their seats by her performance. I’m nowhere near talented enough to adequately describe how she set fire to the Shubert’s stage on a nightly basis, so thank Marilyn for YouTube.

I would swap nights between “Chicago” and “Grease,” which was at the Eugene O’Neill Theatre. I referred to my time at “Grease” as “Grease Hell” — everyone there was in hell, the cast, the crew, the audience. It was not enjoyable. Worse, you couldn’t lock up your souvenir stand at “Grease,” so you had to sit through the entire show – a rather cruel irony, as I was free to come and go at will at “Chicago.” I don’t recommend seeing this production of “Grease” once let alone almost a dozen times. Even mediocre songs performed poorly can stick in your head. One of the bartenders at the Eugene O’Neill would occasionally sing her unique version of “Born to Hand Jive” but would replace “jive” with “job.” Not to be ungallant but I believed her. I eventually made the bold move of asking to work only “Chicago.” My very English boss at the time shrugged and said, “Sure.” My first hard-ball business negotiation.

The best part of seeing the show eight times a week was that I could focus on other members of the cast. Some of my favorites were Bruce Anthony Davis, Jim Borstelmann — one of the great gypsies of Broadway, Mary Ann Lamb, Caitlin Carter, and Leigh Zimmerman, who later played Velma in London’s West End. You could spend a night just watching one of them and be thoroughly entertained.

When Zimmerman left “Chicago,” she gave farewell presents to all her coworkers — including those of us working front of house. I thought that was classy at the time and have come to appreciate the gesture even more after later working at companies where the “rank-and-file” employees (yes, they used that term) were viewed as mostly disposable resources rather than as extensions of the same united effort.

I don’t recall if it was either my last night at the show or Neuwirth’s, but my boss — now longer English but another nice guy — gave me a “Chicago” program that Neuwirth had inscribed to me over her photo on the inside page. I’ve never been one for autographs but this is definitely one of my most prized possessions — now preserved behind glass, as my memories of this show in its early days are forever preserved in my mind.

 

 
1 Comment

Posted by on December 3, 2011 in Pop Life

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

Recurring Feature (at least until Dec. 26): It’s a Wonderful Lives…

“It’s a Wonderful Life” is my least favorite film that my favorite actor (Jimmy Stewart) made — that’s not a dig, as it’s sort of like referring to your least favorite sunset in Paris. However, I’ve probably seen it the most often due to the period in the 1980s when it was shown constantly (this phenomenon was satirized in a 1987 episode of “Cheers”).

Either as a side-effect of getting older or simply the times in which we live, I confess that the film becomes more bittersweet with each year’s inevitable viewing. Are there any George Baileys left in the modern world? Were they all ground under the iron heel of the Mr. Potters who run our corporations, our banks, and, well, our country? Yet, every year, Americans curl up with a glass of eggnog and root for George while later voting for Mr. Potter, who is quite clear in his intent to pave over Bedford Falls and erect a consumerist Pottersville-nightmare.

Oh well, Christmas is, after all, all about cognitive dissonance, so let’s just embrace it until our bleary-eyed, New Year’s hangover greets us in 2012.

If “A Christmas Carol” offers the promise of redemption, the appeal of “It’s a Wonderful Life” is the notion that your life actually matters and has a demonstrably positive effect on other people. It warms even the coldly cynical part of me that believes the universe is just too big for one person’s absence or involvement to make much of a difference. And before anyone counters with Hitler, I would point out that there’s always someone next in line.

In 1996, I spent Christmas Eve in a bar just to recreate this moment.

Also, like “A Christmas Carol,” “It’s a Wonderful Life” has inspired countless explorations of its themes in TV and film. I’ll be generous here and call them “homages.” The effective “It’s a Wonderful Life” formula requires a decent man pushed to the brink and a satanic figure who would run riot in the world if that good man gives up in the face of his endless struggle with him. The film is an obvious Christ allegory but with a happy ending — God intervenes and prevents George’s suicide rather than insisting it’s part of a larger plan, and the people of Bedford Falls do not abandon George in his most vulnerable moment. Yeah, maybe the Christ story is more realistic.

I thought it might be fun — if for no one but myself — to revisit a few of these “It’s a Wonderful Life” remakes in their various forms (as I plan to do with “A Christmas Carol”). The first one is from a 2008 episode of the daytime soap opera “The Young and the Restless,” which always featured a Christmas-themed episode I found myself watching during my single days. In a way, it combines both “A Christmas Carol” and “It’s a Wonderful LIfe” — Michael Baldwin, unlike George Bailey, is no saint. Years ago, he was a pretty vile character who committed acts that would make Herman Cain blush. He’s since redeemed himself and, as the following clips reveal, makes the world around him a better one.

I personally doubt this will happen with Cain, but who knows? He’ll probably need the help of three spirits but those guys do good work.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 2, 2011 in Pop Life, Social Commentary

 

Tags: , , ,

How the Gingrich insults poor people…

Newt Gingrich has a curious hobby. No, not his semiannual weddings but his habit of insulting poor people.

Recently, Gingrich suggested “that American school systems should fire their unionized janitors and let underprivileged children do the work instead, according to a report in Politico.” It’s worth noting that he made these comments to the countless underprivileged kids at Harvard University.

This was rejected as more of Gingrich’s typical, “are there no prisons?” nonsense — similar to his statements about orphanages back in the early ’90s. Dave Jamieson at The Huffington Post dismantled Gingrich’s argument:

Despite its relatively modest pay, a janitor’s job isn’t as easy as Gingrich seems to think it is. According to the Labor Department, a janitor needs to be able to carry out a long list of duties and repairs during a typical day: Mop and polish floors, handle dangerous chemicals, even perform basic electrical and plumbing repairs. At schools, they also need to interact well with children and, at times, clean up their vomit.

A janitor’s job is also more dangerous than most American occupations — and hardly fit for children, according to the Labor Department’s description of the work. Janitors, it notes, “may suffer cuts, bruises, and burns from machines, handtools, and chemicals. They spend most of their time on their feet, sometimes lifting or pushing heavy furniture or equipment. Many tasks, such as dusting or sweeping, require constant bending, stooping, and stretching.”

Gingrich did not skulk away quietly in the light of reason. He now claims his views were “spun out of control” by “the left” (yeah, those guys again).

“Really poor children in really poor neighborhoods have no habits of working and have nobody around them who works,” the former House speaker told an audience at the headquarters for Nationwide Insurance.

Paris Hilton demonstrates the work ethic and value of a dollar her family fortune instilled in her.

This is demonstrably false and insulting. Poor children see their parents working sometimes multiple jobs in order to survive. He seems to have the poor confused with the idle rich, such as (Pick Your) Kardashian and ex-con Paris Hilton.

He then seemed to imply that a young, poor individual’s only likely source of possible income would be from breaking the law.

“They have no habit of ‘I do this and you give me cash’–unless it’s illegal.”

Again, I think he’s confused the poor with his buddies at Freddie Mac. True, no one has been arrested yet for bringing down the U.S. economy and quite a few people in poor neighborhoods are arrested because they live in poor neighborhoods.

Gingrich added that most successful businesspeople he knows started work “early” and made some kind of money when they were kids, whether it was by babysitting or mowing lawns.

He’s describing in a general sense what we call “chores” — a valuable, character-building concept but not technically “work.” I mowed the lawn myself (the backyard until my father trusted me near the front yard when I was in high school) but that was for comic book money. I never had to work to put food on the table. And I never had politicians suggesting that my father should lose his job and — if that wasn’t enough of a punch in the gut — his teenage son should replace him for a fraction of the cost.

“What if you paid them part time in the afternoon to sit in the clerical office and greet people as they came in? What if you paid them to work as the assistant librarian? And I’d pay them as early as is reasonable and practical,” he said Thursday.

What Gingrich isn’t addressing is that working-class jobs — be they clerical or janitorial — used to be something for which an adult could earn a living wage. Gingrich and his ilk have pretty much eliminated that. And, yes, technology has also done its part. However, if you wish to invest in children and their future, the key is education. After-school programs such as the Drama Club, yearbook, or orchestra instill responsibility, teamwork, and improve self-esteem. Let’s actually focus on putting these poor kids’ parents back to work. This doesn’t mean that after-school jobs for kids is a bad idea. I learned a lot working in a supermarket in high school. I was able to even open my first checking account. However, Gingrich does a disservice to everyone by insisting these “moral” lessons are exclusive to the poor. A rich kid can benefit from sweeping the floors of his school, as well.

Gingrich may be many things not printable in a family publication but he’s not stupid. The contempt he’s shown for the poor with these comments and also his comments about the Occupy movement implies that he believes a majority of U.S. voters think this way. We need to prove him decisively wrong.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 1, 2011 in Political Theatre

 

Tags: , , ,

It’s still a bum deal, Ms. Richards…

It’s still a bum deal, Ms. Richards…

The great Holland Taylor is currently performing in a one-woman show about former Texas governor Ann Richards (“ANN: An Affectionate Portrait of Ann Richards“) at the Charline McCombs Empire Theater in San Antonio, Texas. This is essentially the chocolate and peanut butter of theatrical experiences as it combines two of my favorite people.

Ann Richards electrified everyone watching — including the 14-year-old me — when she delivered the keynote address as the 1988 Democratic National Convention. Every line was Julia Sugarbaker gold but the most remembered is her lament for “Poor George (H.W. Bush)… He can’t help it. He was born with a silver foot in his mouth.” One less recalled line but one that still rings true is, “And you don’t have to be from Waco to know that when the Pentagon makes crooks rich and doesn’t make America strong, that it’s a bum deal.”

Of course, beneath the sharp wit is the sadness of what came to pass: The Reagan Era that Richards says was soon to end obviously didn’t. I always thought it was because we sent a Dukakis to do a job best suited for a Richards.

Ms. Richards was governor of Texas from 1991 to 1995. She had struggled with alcoholism in her life but that battle helped inform a compassionate means of dealing with substance abuse and crime:

… the state of Texas, when I was governor, we built an awful lot of prisons. And to be frank with you, I made a deal, and the deal was that I would help pass the legislation and be for building a lot more prisons in Texas if I could get rehab programs for people who were alcoholics and drug abusers because I knew that over 80 percent of the crime committed in Texas was committed by people under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

And unless you treat that alcoholism and you treat that drug addiction, when they go right back out on the street, you got a drunk or you’ve got an addict that is going to commit a crime again.

George W. Bush defeated Ms. Richards in 1994. Karl Rove, the brains behind this victory, cynically stated that her loss was attributable in part to her opposition to a concealed weapon bill, which Bush later signed into law while also executing more prisoners than any other governor in history (he obviously did not see the cognitive dissonance here), and her warning to a Girl Scouts conference to beware of “Prince Charming on a motorcycle with a beer gut and a wandering eye.” That was actually pretty sound advice — not just for Girl Scouts but for the whole country. Rove is less upfront about the dirty tricks that were linked to him during the campaign.

In 1994, when Bush ran against Democratic Gov. Ann Richards in Texas, a whisper campaign began in East Texas that Richards had appointed gays and lesbians to state positions, which was true. The issue got little notice until Bush’s East Texas campaign chairman accused the governor of naming “avowed and activist homosexuals” to high offices.

I am impressed that 20 years ago Ms. Richards hired qualified people regardless of their sexual orientation (“avowed and activist” is usually translated to mean “not frightened and in a closet”). I also appreciated her inclusiveness — speaking Spanish during her keynote address in recognition of her state’s background.

Here is a clip of Holland Taylor as Ms. Richards in the play she painstakingly researched and wrote herself. If it eventually reaches Broadway, it will prove a worthy rationale for my brief return to New York.

And, because I love watching it, here’s Ms. Taylor accepting a well-earned Emmy for her work in “The Practice”:

“Overnight,” indeed.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on December 1, 2011 in Political Theatre, Pop Life

 

Tags: , , ,