RSS

Category Archives: Social Commentary

The Wild West…

Well, it’s Tuesday, so it must be another self-defense shooting in America

An Arizona man who shot and killed an unarmed man during a fight in a Walmart store has not been charged after arguing that the shooting was in self-defense, according to police.
Kyle Wayne Quadlin, 25, told Chandler police that he shot Charles Belinte Chee, 36, after their argument at the service counter Sunday turned into a fight he didn’t think he could win.

Unless you’re facing Ivan Drago in the ring after a night of carousing with James Brown, how likely is a “fight you can’t win” going to result in death?

Does a potential bloody nose justify fatally shooting someone?

This also presupposes the deceased started the fight. Apparently, it doesn’t matter who started the fight, just that the shooter felt that he was in fear for his life. In that case, if someone initiates a physical confrontation, what is the average person supposed to do to not wind up dead and have his or her killer walk free? I have the right to defend myself but even if I choose to retreat, what if I don’t have the option? The only reason I’d get into a fight is to defend myself and even then I’m just trying to stop someone from continuing the fight. How can I do that but also persuade him that just because he’s losing, I don’t mean to kill him?

The shooter might claim his life was in danger and he had to kill me, but I tend to question the rationality of people who start fights in public places, who yell at kids about their music choices in a parking lot, or confront someone who is texting in a theater. They’ve already demonstrated that peaceful resolutions to situations are beyond them.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 19, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

The Eyes of Facebook Are Upon You…

A piece in The Atlantic describes how Facebook proves we’re all very predictable.

As couples become couples, Facebook data scientist Carlos Diuk writes, the two people enter a period of courtship, during which timeline posts increase. After the couple makes it official, their posts on each others’ walls decrease—presumably because the happy two are spending more time together.

In the post on Facebook’s data science blog, Diuk gives hard numbers:

During the 100 days before the relationship starts, we observe a slow but steady increase in the number of timeline posts shared between the future couple. When the relationship starts (“day 0”), posts begin to decrease. We observe a peak of 1.67 posts per day 12 days before the relationship begins, and a lowest point of 1.53 posts per day 85 days into the relationship. Presumably, couples decide to spend more time together, courtship is off, and online interactions give way to more interactions in the physical world.

I suppose if you’re keeping track of this sort of thing, it’s better to be paid for it.

I presume this will allow users the ability to filter out new couples. Although, a more useful filter would be parents who post so many photos of their kids, you’d think they work for Gerber.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 16, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

“We must learn to love together as brothers or perish together as fools.”

Another public shooting. So it goes.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 16, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

America circles the drain…

Bobby Jindal warns about the “silent war on religion.

Nietzsche condemned Christianity as a religion consisting of nothing more than resentment for life and those who enjoy it. The constant victim mentality of late also seems to prove him right.

Fortunately, nothing lasts forever, including a nation founded in violence and maintained with hubris.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 16, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

What makes a man?

Wallace Shawn defends Woody Allen in an op-ed piece in the L.A. Times and does so in a way consistent with how many men have responded to this issue.

First is to castigate others for “gossiping” about public figures. This is intended to dismiss any serious discussion about sexual abuse and the bravery it takes for victims to speak out as mere “gossip” — the activity of clucking hens.

Yet, despite attacking the gossip, the man feels it necessary to have his say — with no real personal experience as a witness of the alleged crime or a victim of sexual abuse. This always come across as the man having the last word before sending the kids to bed.

Finally, there is a defense of Allen that is based solely on a professional relationship, which is ironic as Allen himself boasts of his ability to compartmentalize his personal and professional lives.

Shawn ends his statement with this:

I’ve never become a friend of Woody Allen or even had any terribly lengthy conversations with him, but I’ve been in his orbit enough so that I can’t possibly see him as the abstract, weird cardboard fantasy figure that one reads about. In fact, like so many of those who have worked with him repeatedly over the decades, I’ve found him to be not merely thoughtful, serious and honest, but extraordinary and even inspiring in his thoughtfulness, seriousness and honesty. Of the people I’ve known, he’s one of those I’ve respected most. And for that reason, I personally would have to say that it would take overwhelming evidence to convince me that he had sexually abused a child, just as it would take overwhelming evidence to convince me that Desmond Tutu, Franklin D. Roosevelt or Doris Lessing had sexually abused a child.

I know women are only usually accused of this but that is the most irrational thing I’ve read in a while. Shawn is not a close friend of Allen. He hasn’t spent much time with him, but hey, we are in the social writerly social circle and he makes swell films, so he’s on the moral level of Tutu, Lessing, and FDR.

Isn’t this the same argument we hear when a woman accuses a man of rape or even sexual harassment? He couldn’t have done it! He’s so good at his job! Think of his esteemed professional reputation!

Thanks, but no thanks, Mr. Shawn. I loved you in Manhattan and Melinda and Melinda, but I still consider a woman’s thoughtful, consistent firsthand account “overwhelming evidence.”

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 15, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

Facebook’s “A Look Back”

Facebook’s “A Look Back”

The Facebook movies celebrating the service’s 10th anniversary — or more accurately the 6th anniversary of people actually using it — features a rather maudlin soundtrack, best suited for the funeral of someone who died young.

I would have selected Tom Cochrane’s “Life is a Highway,” which is what I plan to have played at my own funeral — no service, no eulogy, just one screening of the video and then they can take my body off to make Arby’s Roast Beef, as is the custom for my ancestors.

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 6, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

Should we raise the minimum wage?

John Green makes some good points.

I have favored replacing the term “minimum wage” with “living wage.” There’s no sense in having a mandated minimum wage if someone working full-time at that rate still requires public assistance because they are below the poverty line. I don’t enjoy subsidizing the profits of the Walton family because it’s in their best interests to not have their employees die of starvation.

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 5, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

The eloquence is what other countries envy most…

Discussing the Super Bowl Coca-Cola “America the Beautiful” commercial, Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe said:

“When I see ads like that, it makes me just smile and think, we’re the United States of America and we do what no other country has been able to do in the history of mankind and the rest of the world, you can… bite me.”

(The bite me was helpfully offered by another pundit on his show but Scarborough agreed immediately.)

 
1 Comment

Posted by on February 5, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: ,

Senseless in Seattle…

I met a colleague at Black Coffee Coop on Capitol Hill today, which we selected because of its mutually beneficial location. I had an event that evening and was dressed in a suit and tie, so I stood out more than I usually do in Seattle.

As the barista rang up my coffee on an iPad, I noticed some Help Wanted flyers on the counter, which violated more laws simultaneously than any random scene from The Wolf of Wall Street.

20140204-155629.jpg

It’s illegal in Washington state to refuse to hire someone because of their race, gender, or sexual orientation. Diversity is a noble goal — if somewhat futile in Seattle — but you can’t achieve it through blatantly discriminatory hiring practices.

It’s less clear if you can legally base hiring decisions on political beliefs or their tolerance for being called “dude.” Personally, I think a FOX News viewer can pour my coffee and charge me too much for the privilege as well as an MSNBC viewer. It doesn’t appear relevant. Also, I imagine a good lawyer can argue that “political views” are different than party affiliation, and if they refuse to hire someone based on their views on marriage equality and abortion, they are in effect discriminating against their religious beliefs.

And a Muslim can probably pour my coffee as well as a Catholic, Jew, or atheist.

 
4 Comments

Posted by on February 4, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,

Why do we continue to live in fear?

Man pulls gun on a Girl Scout.

These days, the good news is that she’s still alive. But isn’t it time we start raising the bar?

 
Leave a comment

Posted by on February 3, 2014 in Social Commentary

 

Tags: , ,